Harlot's Ghost: A Novel

If you have time to spare, this may be for you,and, even at over 1100 pages it's a good read. A fictional account of the CIA as seen by the hero, agent Harry Hubbard. Through Watergate, the Bay of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, Mafia, JFK, Marlyn Monroe, Sinatra, Castro, Helms, Dulles, Hoover, all the political dramas of the 50's and 60's, and CIA/FBI rivalry. Harlot, Hubbard's godfather, and Cal his father, are very senior CIA men. Even the love of his life, Kittredge, is CIA, and much of the story is told in letters between the two. This is not James Bond, even though assassination plots, sabotage,and heaps of sex, abound.My main criticism of the book is that the numerous characters, real or fictional, can be referred to by surname, first name, cover name, or a CIA cryptonym, which can make it confusing. There is a decode at the end of the book which is hard to continually access if you're on Kindle. I wish I had taken notes!

"Harlot's Ghost" is a major novel by a major, and unique American novelist, Norman Mailer. Originally published in 1992, it was a return to form for Mailer after many years in which he was better known for his non-fiction and his highly public boozing and brawling lifestyle. While it is worthy of being celebrated for many not inconsiderable virtues, it is also seriously flawed: overlong, plodding and inconclusive (the novel closes with the words "To Be Continued" but it never was.) It is probably best enjoyed by someone who shares some of the author's obsessions with the CIA, the Kennedy assasination and the ideals associated with male vigor that the generation that came of age during World War II adhered to prior to the sexual revolution of the 60s.It is a fictionalized account of the CIA, focusing on the years between 1955 and 1963, culiminating in the assasination of President Kennedy. (As a point of reference, Robert deNiro's recent film "The Good Shephard" covers similar ground.) It's sweeping narrative encompasses a number of factual tales along the way, including the spying tunnel built by the CIA under East Berlin in the 50's and the book's centerpiece, the CIA's involvement in the Bay of Pigs fiasco in 1961, the CIA's bungled attempt at an invasion of Cuba to foment a counter-revolution against Castro. It is informed by the extensive airing of the CIA's penchant for "dirty tricks" that became public in the wake of the Watergate scandal.Mailer's novelization covers this factual ground in a relatively entertaining fashion using a fictinal narrator named Herrick (Harry) Hubbard. He is himself a CIA operative and witness to many of these real-life events. Hubbard is a Company insider, to the manor born through both his father and his godfather (whose code name is Harlot of the title), both legendary OSS agents during WWII who are then present at the creation of the American spy agency built to contest the Soviet KGB at the outset of the Cold War. Harlot is modeled on the famous CIA superspy James Jesus Angleton, and Harry Hubbard doing his bidding is Harlot's ghost of the title.There are a number of serious problems with the book which are perhaps accentuated by that tantalizing "To Be Continued." The narrative arc of Hubbard's education into both his chosen profession and the erotic mysteries of sex is episodic & inconclusive. Hubbard's memoir is awkwardly fashioned mainly from a clandestine correspondnce he carries on with Harlot's attractive young wife, Kittredge, who also happens to be employed by the CIA. The voluminous and unctuous letter-writing campaign is fatal to the book. The secret letters are explicit acts of betrayal and confession for both Harry and Kittredge. But instead of having an edge that sparkles, the letters fizzle and our interest in the authors wanes. The correspondence is downright boring in large patches, and elsewhere strains the credularity of the Reader -- who are these people? -- in many other passages. Neither Harry or Kittredge ever develop into characters with any spark of life. They are not believable. The Reader never musters much sympathy for these rather wooden, one-dimensional protagonists. Another problem is they are really on the edge of most of the action, never comprehending the bigger picture, murky as it is in this nether-world of spooks (real and imnagined) and double agents. Mailer labors mightily to make this creaky narrative apparatus work, but it doesn't quite.Numerous real personages put in both cameo and extended appearances, among them E. Howard Hunt (later of Watergate fame), Allen Dulles, J Edgar Hoover, Robert Kennedy, Wild Bill Harvey (who unmasked the high ranking British double agent Kim Philby), and a juicy, fictionalized version of Judith Campbell Exner, the beautiful and sexy mistress of both JFK and mob kingpin Sam Giancana (by way of Frank Sinatra). The CIA's tragic-comic experiments with LSD, its collusion with organized crime to assasinate Castro, the extensive wire-tapping on US citizens performed by FBI under J Edgar Hoover are well-documented events that are woven into the plot. In Mailer hands, it is a rich brew, even if it all doesn't quite come together. The narrative gels in many sections as young Harry learns his tradecraft during a stint in Uruguay in the late '50s or makes a daring midnight raid on the coast of Cuba during the 1962 missile crisis that brought the US and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war.But the length of the book, its many sodden passages, and its lack of any sort of a coherent conclusion may cause you to wonder -- a 1000+ pages later -- whether it was worth the ride.

Norman Mailer is truly a genius. I am a writer and was curious about this book because it is famous for not being able to turned into a screenplay. Several writers had tried to do so and just couldn't capture essence of Harlot's Ghost. I now understand the reason for their failure. Mailer writes the characters in their shadowy duplicity Their work becomes who they are. He does this so very cleverly; I, at first, thought the writing awkward. It wasn't until I was well into the book that I realized the genius of his use of intrigue and duplicity. I had to go back and start the book, again, now understanding who the characters were. This book is a study, for any author, in character development. No one has ever done this before; as a mystery writer, I need to learn this technique. "The Good Shepherd" doesn't come near to what this book is about; LOVED IT!!!!!

There is a pretty good 600 to 700 page novel in here. Unfortunately, this opus is 1300 plus pages so you can guess that I found a lot of excess in Harlot's Ghost. Frankly, there are reams of it, and a lot of it is pretty tough sledding to get through.Before his passing, Norman Mailer cited Harlot's Ghost as one of the 5 or so novels he was proudest of and considered his best work. I can understand his pride because he had obviously done a prodigious amount of research for the novel and throughout the book you have the sense that he got a lot of the spycraft and the inner workings of the CIA right. He also caught the very WASPy air of the early CIA and its founders and practioners, and he recreated the Cold War mindset quite well. As I said, there is a very good book within this encyclopedic epic.But there is an awful lot of rubbish too. I found all the frabba jabba about the Alpha and Omega theory to be silly. I found pages upon pages of elaboration that neither moved the story along nor offered any pertinent insights or interest. I found the object of our hero's romantic affection, Kitteridge, not very interesting, and many of their letters (which form a substantial part of the book) overdone, and overly precious.The book finally picks up interest in the last quarter with its sometimes gossipy-but-accurate, anecdote-laden recitation of the Bay of Pigs fiasco, the Kennedy brothers, Castro, and the CIA characters involved. Having just read the history of the CIA in Legacy of Ashes, I thought Mailer fleshed all of this out quite well and entertainingly.I am glad I finally forced myself to persevere in working through this monster, for in the end I found it a worthwhile read, although I wonder if some of my satisfaction is simply the fact that I finished the damn thing; but no, there was much that was quite good. I just found the jewel that is in there is buried amongst a ton of well-researched, but often extraneous and boring detail. Detail became filler. No, it wasn't the length of the book (I've read War in Peace twice and never felt that a single page could be cut), it was just an awful lot of the book spent a tremendous amount of verbiage to little effect.Undeterred however, I am about to tackle Mailer's Ancient Evenings which looks to be another long haul. I'll let you know.

Great Start. Then drags on for 800 pages. Too many letters between two characters. So glad the following two parts were never written. Tough guys dont dance and two other earlier novels highly recommend.

Just a great book buff said

nice!

This plot line had its day.

Excellent, re-reading it