The Devil's Delusion MP3 CD – Audiobook, November 3, 2015

In the documentary movie Expelled by Ben Stein, one of those interviewed was David Berlinski, author of the book under review, for his assessment of evolution, intelligent design, and the dogmatic opposition to any criticism of Darwinism by the scientific establishment. As far as I know, this book is Berlinski's first book-length criticism of Darwinism and especially of what has come to be known as scientism (the atheistic religion that pretends that it is based on science). The interesting title of Berlinski's book comes from an amalgamation of Richard Dawkins' book The God Delusion, McGrath's response The Dawkins Delusion?: Atheist Fundamentalism and the Denial of the Divine, and another book by Dawkins titled A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love. Berlinski describes himself as a "secular Jew," and says that his "religious education did not take. I can barely remember a word of Hebrew. I cannot pray." Although he does not, to my knowledge, say he is an agnostic, it seems that that must be what he is. He has a Ph.D. from Princeton University and has taught mathematics and philosophy at universities in the United States and in France. He has written math and science books such as A Tour of the Calculus, The Advent of the Algorithm: The 300-Year Journey from an Idea to the Computer, and Newton's Gift: How Sir Isaac Newton Unlocked the System of the World. In approaching what may well be the most controversial and defining topic of our time, I suppose that one of two approaches can be taken. One would be a serious presentation of the scientific facts and attempting to reason with those who are opposed to your point of view. The other approach may well be to ridicule your opponents, call them stupid, and make sport of the issue. Berlinski has chosen the latter approach. However, after calling them stupid, he gives detailed rationale as to why the charge is appropriate. In a sense I suppose he combines the two approaches. His dry humor is throughout the book that could not be pulled off by anyone of lesser brilliance, but shines more brightly in some sections. Here and there his humor evokes out-loud laughter from the reader, although no doubt that depends somewhat on the reader's worldview. Berlinski takes them all on by name and pulls no punches. He seems to take great delight in pointing out their errors of logic, their incorrect scientific facts, their gross extrapolations, their superficial understanding of science, the absurdities of what they actually profess to believe, and their lack of humility before the mysteries of life. For an agnostic, if that is what he is, he seems to have admiration for theologians and others who struggle to make sense of life, and surprisingly, and delightfully to me, he quotes Scripture to make some of his points. A strange prophet he, but then God can obtain praise from the rocks if it please Him to do so.The book has ten chapters. The chapter titles are as follows: Chapter 1. No Gods Before Me, 2. Nights of Doubt, 3. Horses Do Not Fly, 4. The Cause, 5. The Reason, 6. A Put-up Job, 7. A Curious Proof That God Does Not Exist, 8. Our Inner Ape, a Darling, and the Human Mind, 9. Miracles in Our Time, and 10. The Cardinal and His Cathedral.The first major area that Berlinski addresses is the criticism that is often made of religious people. When Sam Harris and others point out the human suffering that has occurred at the hands of religious leaders, Berlinski agrees fully. However, to leave it there as though something significant has been said raises more questions than it answers. He describes Harris' book Letter to a Christian Nation (Vintage) as "devoid of any intellectual substance whatsoever." Berlinski elaborates: "A great deal of human suffering has been caused by religious fanaticism. If the Inquisition no longer has the power to compel our indignation, the Moslem world often seems quite prepared to carry the burden of exuberant depravity in its place. Nonetheless, there is this awkward fact: The twentieth century was not an age of faith, and it was awful. Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao, and Pol Pot will never be counted among the religious leaders of mankind." He then lists for us 63 wars that took place during the 20th century with the number of those killed in each. The numbers are staggering: 15 million in WWI, 55 million in WWII, 20 million under Stalin, 40 million under Mao, etc. This sort of information, of course, does not justify religious intolerance of any kind, but it certainly does help to put things into perspective, and completely counters any suggestion that the world would be safe and secure if we could just get rid of religion, as at least implied by, if not actually stated, by the likes of Harris, Dawkins, etc. Not only in terms of wars, but other writers such as Steven Pinker make claims about how much better the world is now as a result of modernity. Berlinski exclaims "The good news is unrelenting . . . In considering Pinker's assessment of the times in which we live, the only conclusion one can profitably draw is that such an excess of stupidity is not often to be found in nature." "What Hitler did not believe and what Stalin did not believe and what Mao did not believe and what the SS did not believe and what the Gestapo did not believe and what the NKVD did not believe and what the commissars, functionaries, swaggering executioners, Nazi doctors, Communist Party theoreticians, intellectuals, Brown Shirts, Black Shirts, gauleiters, and a thousand party hacks did not believe was that God was watching what they were doing."Another area that Berlinski addresses is the way philosophical "proofs" for the existence of God are dismissed by atheists. He has a great deal of admiration for Aquinas, and summarizes his cosmological argument (not "proof") for the existence of God. Before dismissing someone who wrote so long ago, consider Berlinski's words: "His life coincided with a period of great brilliance in European art, architecture, law, poetry, philosophy, and theology. Commentators who today talk of the dark ages, when faith instead of reason was said ruthlessly to rule, have for their animadversions only the excuse of perfect ignorance." The cosmological argument is simply that the universe has a cause. Many, apparently, think it has no cause or purpose. That flies in the face of common sense, even the common sense of a child, but nonetheless it is held. But then Berlinski goes on to argue how the philosophical cosmological argument has been greatly bolstered from the "very place one might least expect it to appear: contemporary physical cosmology." Berlinski reviews the findings of the "Big Bang" theory and other modern discoveries that Aquinas knew nothing of but strongly supports the cosmological argument for the existence of God. "If nothing else, the facts of Big Bang cosmology indicate that one objection to the argument that Thomas Aquinas offered is empirically unfounded: Causes in nature do come to an end. If science has shown that God does not exist, it has not been by appealing to Big Bang cosmology. The hypothesis of God's existence and the facts of contemporary cosmology are consistent." He then delightfully quotes from modern scientists, including Nobel Prize winners, who have not overlooked the religious significance of these modern scientific discoveries. For example, "`So long as the universe had a beginning,' Stephen Hawking has written, `we could suppose it had a creator.'" For another example, "`The best data we have concerning the big bang,' the Nobel laureate Arno Penzias remarked, `are exactly what I would have predicted, had I nothing to go on but the five books of Moses, the Psalms, the Bible as a whole.'" If some atheists want to dismiss such things, it is only because they have no real response to give. Berlinski presents the best arguments from philosophy and from science for the existence of God that I have read.Berlinski's criticism of Darwinian evolution of humans is brutal: "It is rather more difficult to take what no one doubts and fashion it into an effective defense of the thesis that human beings are nothing but the living record of an extended evolutionary process. That requires a disciplined commitment to a point of view that owes nothing to the sciences, however loosely construed, and astonishingly little to the evidence." Of course, there are many who may require some convincing, so just saying that evolution has little evidence in its support won't do the job. But arguments there are a plenty. "Darwinian biologists are very often persuaded that there is a conspiracy afoot to make them look foolish. In this they are correct." "Suspicions about Darwin's theory arise for two reasons. The first: the theory makes little sense. The second: it is supported by little evidence." Okay, no argument presented here. You'll have to read this book, as well as perhaps some others, if you want the details.Putting words in God's mouth and sounding like a passage from Job, Berlinski writes "You have no idea whatsoever how the ordered physical, moral, mental, aesthetic, and social world in which you live could have ever arisen from the seething anarchy of the elementary particles." This is a delightful book to read, especially so since it comes from a somewhat unexpected source.

The book is very well written and a joy to read. I nearly read the entire thing in my first sitting-- I could not put it down. The author, David Berlinski, proves to be quite hilarious while insulting much of the ignorance of Naturalism. He does this while skillfully remaining constantly informative but not overwhelmingly so. He covers many topics rapidly, which I enjoyed. Reading his uncensored rebuttals to many of the standard narratives of Naturalism and Atheism was vastly enjoyable. When I purchased the book, I was unsure what to expect because I had never read the author, but I can confidently tell you that this book is fantastic! Think of David Berlinski as a Richard Dawkins for faith. Many hard counterpoints land on the proverbial face of the atheist like a bright red handprint. Slap! Loved the book!

The purpose of the book is not to prove the existence of god, but to show that at the very least, atheists have not offered proof that there is no god. In this respect, the book does a good job of pointing out many areas where atheists appear to claim proof that there is no god and showing that, in fact, science does not explicitly disprove god. From my basic understanding of science, he does a good job in discussing how physics does not necessitate that god not exist. However, at times he calls into doubt so much of physics that you can nearly be left wondering if he believes anything at all can be known with any confidence. However, in this respect he is perhaps more honest than most in explaining just how far physics has to go; we have made advancements, but we have not reconciled some key areas of physics(for instance General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics) and other areas are still the subject of debate and research without, as of yet, conclusive results.However, once he steps into biology he makes clear his disdain for Darwinism and even calls into question whether most biologists even believe in Natural Selection. In this area, it seems that perhaps the author does not understand evolution as well as he does physics and his arguments are much less convincing. He seems to be doing more to try to question an area of science that is really not under debate in the scientific community and jumps to various conclusions without very good evidence and evens assumes that the "default position" is to believe that we are made in god's image. He argues further about the lack of a good theory for consciousness and believes we cannot assume consciousness (or other functions such as exactly how we see with our eyes) is completely the result of a physical process. Personally, I found many of his arguments regarding biology to be lacking a solid foundation and he appears to jump to some conclusions more readily than one might expect from a secular member of society.Overall, the author does a good job of clarifying that it is virtually impossible to disprove god and does so mostly without promoting any particular religion. It is at least worth reading by religious people as perhaps a better and more rational response to atheism than many of the "logical proofs" that some religious people promote as the text does not attempt to prove god's existence. It is also worth reading for many atheists and agnostics (though you will have your reasons to disagree and I will not digress to explain in this review) as it is better (and perhaps more tolerable) criticism than what one might expect from such a text. However, truly thoughtful readers will find both solid points and weak points regardless of personal beliefs. At the very least it is good food for thought without too much of the name calling the permeates many books regarding god's existence (or lack thereof).

Really enjoyed reading the book. Berlinski lays bear all the weak arguments that Atheism is based. Also, the tremendous intolerance that Atheists show towards any idea that doesn't agree with theirs. "The same people who complained about the Inquisition and witches being burned at the stake were now enjoying a little heresy hunting of their own. The advocates of tolerance were not themselves very tolerant. And, apparently, religious zealots don’t have a monopoly on dogmatism, incivility, fanaticism, and paranoia." (from There is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind by Antony Flew and Roy Abraham Varghese)

Eigentlich ist das ein staubtrockenes Philiosophie Thema. Über Gottesbeweise gibt es ganze Bibliotheken sehr ernsthafter und kluger Bücher. Normalerweise schläft man nach 10 Seiten ein. Wer hätte gedacht, dass man darüber ein humorvolles Buch schreiben kann, das trotzdem analytische Schärfe und philiosophische Reflektion bietet? Es macht Spaß dieses Buch zu lesen und sich zu amüsieren und erst im Nachhinein, oder beim 2. Lesen die Tiefen der Argumentation zu erfahren. Berlinski schreibt dieses Buch als Gegenposition zu der Behauptung atheistischer Autoren, dass die Wissenschaft die Nichtexistenz Gottes bewiesen hätte. Er nimmt schon aus akademischem Widerspruchsgeist die gegensätzliche Position ein weil eben diesem atheistischen Anspruch nicht genug widersprochen wird. Dabei setzt er Ironie und Sarkasmus bewußt provokativ und unterhaltend ein. Wenn sie sich also dafür interessieren und mal etwas humorvolles zu einem ansonsten eher trockenen Thema lesen wollen, so sind sie hier genau richtig. Nun ja, man muss allerdings Englisch können. Aber vielleicht findet sich ja auch nochmal jemand der sich traut es ins Deutsche zu übersetzen.

This author is very interesting. This book is the result of that. Do the new atheists even know logic? I do not think so.

A difficult topic which has defeated many, but David Berlinski manages to hold his place at the end of the joust. A serious topic handled adroitly with understated wit but serious intent.

I am just finishing a book by David Berlinsk - The Devil's Delusion - and I have to say I have been overwhelmed by the brilliance of this man. When have you ever read a book about the philosophy of science, delivering intellectual blow after intellectual blow against the ridiculous schoolboy moronic pretentious lunacies - overblown and absolutely unjustified claims of self-proclaimed 'scientific atheists' - Dawkins, Dennett, Coyne, Harris, Hitchens etc.etc. and found yourself in constant laughter. I was amazed to find my self laughing out loud at the razor sharp wit indicating the absurdities of the various idiotic claims made by various self-appointed guardians of scientism - page after page. I cannot praise Berlinski enough - incisive intellect, widely knowledgeable, supremely witty and deeply humane. The last put-down I read which made me laugh - "When asked what he was in awe of, Christopher Hitchens responded that his definition of an educated person is that you have some idea how ignorant you are. This seems very much as if Hitchens were in awe of his own ignorance, in which case he has surely found an object worthy of his veneration" - This book is absolutely brilliant!