We Paperback – August 1, 1993

Yevgeny Zamyatin in his creation of We the novel allows the reader into the personal issues of a number of the One State. This internal struggle not only affects the mind of this number but it starts to get him into situations that he never imagined. While this overall plot is an impressive feat, it is the inner working that Zamyatin is subtly commenting on that really drives a reader to keep going.The dystopian world the Zamyatin sets up has both equal creativity as well as reality. The time he is writing in, during world war one and his own country’s revolutions, brings forth a fear that readers of the time could relate to. This dystopian world was a possibility, in some capacity, for all of it’s futuristic details, and as the readers of the time, settled into their minds for the long haul. As a present day reader, it still resonates ninety years later.As a member of the One State, the character D-503 brings to light the rebellion within us all. Whether we like it or not, it seems hardwired within our system to question what is around us, including our authorities and systems. And yet, his final choices contrast to the struggle underneath all humans: order and the loyalty of repetition. We have proven as people that we will give up freedom for peace, and will submit to the yoke if the promise is happiness. The allusions the Zamyatin makes to the weakened human soul, of any soul being a negative thing, only enhances the fear we may one day feel as members of this futuristic One State.The book brings about many emotions in a reader, but leaves some parts hanging. Whether this is the intent of the author or not, I was left wanting a little bit more. I wanted to see the next chapter of the book, which I guess all good books have within them. While it was difficult going through the first few chapters, or entries, it was well worth hanging on to see the result. Each entry gives a little more insight to the picture, and sometimes I got that D-503 was either letting it all out, his entire thoughts, or that he was holding something back, for fear of making it come real. The vivid descriptions allow one to easily picture life in the One State, allowing the reader to proceed as they will: personally, I took it in as D-503, trying to see as he saw, and not watching him from above, an observer. There were some times I felt that I had to be the observer than the character, but it was only to get the bigger picture of what was going on, just something that D-305 couldn’t. To be honest, I would be excited to see a sequel to this story, but I know that almost never happens with dystopian novels: so i shall wonder after the affairs of the One State and the beloved D-503

The narrator of We, D-503, is a mathematician and engineer, the primary designer of a rocket called the INTEGRAL. D-503 is a citizen of the totalitarian OneState, in which the Benefactor presides over a society of perfect reason. People are "Numbers." There is no I anywhere in the society, no concept of an individual. Each Number is simply a component of the larger We.Everyone's daily lives are governed by the Table, which tells them when to get up, when to eat, when to work, when to have sex, how many times to chew each mouthful of food, etc. When the Numbers go out for their walk at the same hour each day, they all walk in lockstep. Every movement at work is governed by the efficiency rules of Frederick Taylor, the mechanical engineer who wrote about efficiency of movement in the workplace.OneState broke separated itself from the rest of the world after the 200-years war. The state itself is a huge city of glass, which the inhabitants are taught to praise for its clarity and transparency. The city is protected from the rest of the world by The Green Wall (which is also made of glass). Beyond the wall are trees and animals and other hideous, disorganized things that have no reason or logic.The Benefactor teaches that happiness comes from the absence of desire, which is irrational, and the path to absence of desire is a strict adherence to logic and reason in all aspects of life.There is no marriage or family on OneState. If a person wants to have sex with another person, they put in an application at the Health Ministry, and if their application is approved, they get a book of pink tickets which they can redeem with their chosen parter at scheduled times.When the book begins, D-503 is at work writing a sort of ode to OneState, which he will put into the INTEGRAL, to be sent off to other planets, to teach the savage inhabitants the greatness of rational civilization. D-503, like everyone else in OneState, believes it is the state's duty to export its system of happiness to all other rational creatures.The problem arises when D-503 is assigned a new sexual partner, I-330, a subversive free-thinker who embraces instinct, desire, the unknown and unknowable. These are all the things OneState has taught its citizens to reject, and things which D-503, being a mathematician, tends to reject by nature. Early on, he describes the encroachment of feeling into his thought process as being like an irrational number that has crept into an equation and can't be factored out.He becomes obsessed with I-330, because she can access feelings in him that he cannot access himself. His impulse toward the irrational becomes overpowering and almost obsessive. Needless to say, this causes a lot of problems in a society that was designed not just to repress, but the deny and invalidate desire, irrationality, the "I", and by extension, imagination and creativity.The book maintains a strong and consistent set of symbols and imagery (the hard, transparent glass, the masses of figures in lock step, the looming accumulator tower, the Green Wall and the ancient house). It also uses the metaphor of mathematics and engineering throughout, as examples of ideal systems of representation and manipulation that can be applied to materials, and which OneState tries to apply to humans. A human who cannot abide by the mathematical logic of OneState, who cannot or will not be engineered into his position in the "We," is seen as a defective part, like a faulty piston or a bad spark plug, and is destroyed by the Benefactor. As one of the characters remarks late in the book, love has to be cruel. This society constantly destroys parts to save the whole, and the Benefactor teaches the Numbers to understand that as an act of love.This book was written around 1921, and the correlation between OneState and communism is obvious. In those early days, at least, communism sought to replace almost every human belief system with reason, and to build an engineered society in which everything was centrally planned. The way the citizens are brainwashed, and the ignorance, fear, and revulsion they feel toward the "mythical" world beyond the Green Wall is reminiscent of today's North Korea.The book also comments quite a bit, both directly and obliquely, on Christianity, which D-503 describes as humanity's first attempt to establish an all-powerful Benefactor (who also happened to be cruel).The one difficulty in reading We lies in the narrator's language in the second half of the book. In the first half, when everything in his daily life is rational and follows the Table of prescribed activities, the narrator's language is clear, detailed, and precise, as you would expect from a mathematician/engineer. Those fields, after all, are all about clarity, precision, and detail.As love, desire, yearning, anger, confusion, and other emotions begin to take over D-503's daily life, he often leaves his sentences hanging, because he simply has no way to express such imprecise emotions. He's trying to describe emotion using the language of OneState, which is a language from which the terms of emotion have been removed. As a result, the narrator leaves many sentences unfinished, because he just doesn't have the words to complete them.This can be maddening at times, especially when the narrative goes like this (I'm paraphrasing): "The footsteps now were close behind me. When I turned to look, I saw it was... Of course, my first thought was... And from his eyes, I could tell he was thinking... And... well... you know."There's a lot of that in the final quarter of the book, as the breakdown of the narrative mirrors the breakdown of order in general, and of the narrator's understanding of his world.