Wausau Exact Vellum Bristol Cardstock, 250 Sheets, White, 94 Brightness, 67 lb, 8.5 x 14 Inches

I use this paper to copy color pages because it has just enough texture that my colored pencils lay down color just right! I do not use it for markers or gel pens! Those require a smooth texture to color right! But I have now bought this paper 3 times & I will continue to purchase it for color pages!

Paper was as described and a good value. I would order again.

Great product for frequently used documents. Arrived with cover wrap torn up. Delivery to business address was terrible. Left behind office door when building was closed during a snow storm. Box was dripping wet. This is not the first time this has happened.

I use this paper for almost all of my business documents. It prints so nicely and feels great to the touch. I receive positive comments on the feel and quality of the paper I use for my marketing materials often. It's only a little more expensive than the normal "office white" paper but exceeds quality tenfold. I love this stuff. May never look back.

so this isnt really vellum…its paper…I would say they are about 65 lb wight..it has some text urge it…i didnt return because the price was so low anyways…will be using for card making and other paper crafts

I've been working on a project that's demanded a lot from my paper (prototyping a new card game), so I thought I'd share what I've learned here:Firstly, the "weight" ratings on paper are incredibly confusing and misleading. There's a dozen different ways to measure weight, things like "cover, index bristol, bristol and tag", etc - so you can pretty much ignore the manufacturer's rating as a reliable indication of which paper is thicker / by how much.In prototyping the card game , we purchased this paper, as well as some by Wausau - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000ETXY78/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B000ETXY78&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=PSQ4523DO2KELRFIEven though the rated weight of the Wasau paper was significantly higher (110 vs 67), we could barely tell the difference in hand. The only reliable way we could tell the difference was that this paper had a rougher texture - so that should be your primary decision point, not how much heavier one claims to be compared to the other's claim.Of course, since this paper is a third the cost, unless you /really/ want smoother paper, I'd recommend going with this paper.I hope you found this helpful!UPDATE: As an added bonus, I recently reviewed several paper cutters and figured that people purchasing card stock might also want to cut it. I found two good options:The $40 Swignline (whose price seems to swing quite a bit) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00006IATH/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00006IATH&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=SV5NFNPKIHFFOBRFAnd the $110 Amzdeal (who is regularly used by small print shops) - http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CI02DSM/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B00CI02DSM&linkCode=as2&tag=allofthetech-20&linkId=63BWPYOBKAPWQAM6If you need the cheapest cutter possible, the Swingline works. It's a little better and a little faster than using scissors, but we found that it was only able to cut about three sheets of cardstock at once, and the lack of clamping meant that longer cuts would drift by up to 1/16th. No good if you're trying to do precision work!When we bought the Swingline, we managed to catch it at one of its low swings, when it was only $26. At $40, the $110 Amzdeal becomes a much better value - we're returning our Swingline and sticking with the Amzdeal. It's a much sturdier machine (the Swingline, made of plastic, actually flexes when you cut). If also provides much better measurement and clamping options, so we're able to get the exact same cut, with no drift, every time. Not only that, this machine is capable of cutting DOZENS of sheets of cardstock, compared to the Swingline's three.

Fast delivery, one of my reams was previously opened and had scotch tape everywhere.

good for making greeting cards. better than store bought Holds up good.

This paper is very nice. It's thicker than I thought it would be with a lovely texture and is perfect for sturdy USA letter size stamp album pages. It goes through our printer beautifully.

Segunda vez que lo compro, amo este papel, es mucho más económico a si lo comprara y cortará yo misma, yo me dedico a la impresión de fanzines y utilizo este para portadas e interiores así como postales y separadores, no consume mucha tinta de impresora,OJO! Dependiendo de tu tinta de impresión es la calidad de imagen, yo uso una Canon PIXMA 1100 para tonos más estructurados y una Epson ekotank para tonos más saturados,también es buenísimo para bocetear y hacer dibujos rápidos con medios secos como lápices de colores, pasteles, incluso marcadores! El papel más versátil que he usado!

BE ADVISED, PAPER PACKAGING MAY BE OPENED! This was the right kind of paper that I needed. However, when I opened my box, the package the paper came in was completely ripped open on both sides. I counted the package of paper twice to find I only had 237 sheets of paper rather than that 250 indicated. Since I need this paper for our art project tomorrow I’ve decided to take my loss and not return. Good quality paper, however I will purchase in store in the future.Thanks!

Only now I can see that it was my mistake, I didn't grasp the meaning in the name of the product which says that is "bristol" and "cardstock" -- meaning very basic, rough finish, almost rustic. It is white bight though. I will sure find some use for it, but not suitable for presentation cards. It is thick enough, but doesn't feel smooth.

La calidad del papel es muy muy buena, tiene un lado con textura y el otro no (anverso y reverso), el paquete llegó abierto pero conté las hojas y son 250 así que sin problema. Lo uso para imprimir libros de colorear y sirve bastante. Soporta bien acuarela y otros medios húmedos sin ser como tal papel de acuarela. Medios mixtos tambien. Lo voy a seguir comprando.