Product Description Oliver Twist (2007) (DVD) .com A plucky, rather than passive, Oliver and a kosher Fagin are just two of the novel twists in this 2007 adaptation of Charles Dickens's oft-filmed tale. Dickens purists may carp about some liberties taken with the book, but after all, in the musical version, Fagin exited stage right singing instead of meeting the more dire fate Dickens devised. And faithful or not, it's still a ripping yarn rich with incident and populated by some of Dickens's most memorable characters, including young Oliver (William Miller), the put-upon orphan who goes from a cruel workhouse to the even crueler streets of London, where he falls in with Fagin (Timothy Spall) and his den of thieving urchins. Two villains impede Oliver's happiness, Tom Hardy's terrifying Bill Sikes (believe him when he says there is no one worse than he), and the despicable Edward Monks (Julian Rhind-Tutt), whose motives for wanting Oliver dead will be revealed over the course of this five-part miniseries. Sophie Okonedo gives a heartbreaking performance as Nancy, whose heart of gold is no protection against her brutal lover Sikes (who seems to care only for his bull terrier), and Adam Arnold is the Artful Dodger who takes Oliver under his wing. Originally broadcast on Masterpiece Theatre, this atmospheric production evocatively captures these worst of times for the desperate impoverished. The Dickensian despair is keenly felt, making Oliver's hard-earned happy ending all the more triumphant. There are many worthy adaptations of Oliver Twists, but this exceeds one's great expectations. --Donald Liebenson
C**T
If you compare it to the book you miss the point
I saw this DVD on sale in a Target store, so I took a chance on it. Luckily, I hadn't read the reviews here or I would have given it a pass. This production of Dickens' famous novel is the least faithful of all the versions I have seen, but I expected that going in. It's basically a stylistic rewrite of the story with a modern audience in mind. Had I been a Dickens purist looking for a mirror image of the book, I would have been appalled, as some reviewers here obviously were.Instead, it's a fresh take on an old story. It doesn't pretend to be faithful. The result for me is that I was highly entertained, and as someone else has pointed out, instead of looking for how many deviations I could find, I was enthralled by the fact that I did NOT know what was coming next. This in effect freed me from the book, which I have read several times (yes, I like Dickens), and allowed me to judge this fresh approach on its own merits.I was quite satisfied with the story as it stood on its own two feet, although the original story is much better. But that was a book (a newspaper serial, actually), not a 173 minute television mini-series. Were I to produce a faithful mini-series of Oliver Twist I would require at least ten hour-long segments. It's a very complicated yarn. (I'd love to film the chapter where Oliver is recuperating in the country.)The cast is excellent for the most part. William Miller (Pieter in "Krakatoa") was an inspired choice for what he was intended to do: portray an appealing yet fearless version of Oliver--a boy who has been subjected to the dreary trials of a workhouse upbringing, yet because of his character has come through it all as a soft spoken, kindly little soul. Adam Arnold as Dodger presents a new "twist" on the character, who is shown as being quite sensitive and vulnerable, and in love with Nancy (who throws him over for Oliver). Bill Sykes is played by Tom Hardy, and while he looks fine in the part, his accent is so extreme I could only understand ever tenth word. He also suffers in my eyes because he's no Robert Newton. That holds true with every other actor who has played Sykes. Similarly, Timothy Spall is no Alec Guiness. I had a hard time swallowing his Fagin, but again this is a rewrite of the story and he does an adequate job with the writer's reconstruction of the character. Mr. Brownlow is played by the ubiquitous Edward? Fox (is he William, James or Edward? I wish he'd make up his mind).If it sounds like I'm having fun with this review, it's probably because I had fun watching this DVD. The extra on the disk is a "making-of" documentary. I enjoyed meeting Will Miller, Sophie Okonedo (Nancy), and others. However, when you listen to the writer, Sarah Phelps, you begin to get an insight into why this Oliver Twist is so different from all the others. She strikes me as an angry, over-the-top liberal who has strong opinions on Dickens and other societal matters. She rubbed me the wrong way, but at the same time I did like very much what she produced. So there you have it in a nutshell.The music didn't bother me one little bit. In fact, its spirited tone fit the revised character of Oliver very well, and I felt it was perfect for this particular production. William Miller is a handsome, lovable boy, and I was very pleased to see Oliver Twist as an engaging, sturdy and athletic youngster for once instead of the meek, frail waif we have always seen, a character who we are to pity. It's a fresh outlook. The rest of the cast, the authentic costuming and backgrounds, yes and even the heavily rewritten story, support this new twist on Oliver Twist very well.It's a good movie. Don't miss it. Take the sour apple reviews with a grain of salt.
O**Y
Amazing Movie with Creative Licenses and Still Fantastic!
This film is excellent. If you're a literary purist and cannot allow that movie adaptations are different than the books you love, then don't bother to watch films of books you love. Simply enjoy the books and leave the films to those who don't mind creative license.I was thoroughly entranced by this movie. From start to finish, the characters held me spellbound and I loved it. The performances were top notch, especially by Sophie Okonedo who played Nancy, Tom Hardy who played Bill Sikes, and William Miller as Oliver Twist.If you want a movie to be identical to a book, then you're likely to live a life of constant disappointment. Movies are movies and will always be the fraternal twin of the book rather than the identical twin. Yes, this is very different in some ways to the book, but the adaptation still shares the DNA of "Oliver Twist". Those of you who say it would be a great movie if only it had a different title would be screaming the injustices of plagiarism if this movie were made and NOT titled "Oliver Twist".You are reviewing a FILM not the book and though it's a film adaptation of a book, it's still a creative piece of its own and as such deserves to be reviewed that way. The book is excellent. It's a classic for a reason. Read it, by all means, I highly encourage everyone to read the book and never rely on a film for your literary knowledge. But please put your biases aside when you watch this film. Because if you do, you will absolutely love it. I promise. :)
V**Y
Great story
This story was very well done and it kept my interest all the way through. I think Charles Dickens wrote the story. I had a heart for the orphan, Oliver Twist.
J**E
FRESH AND VITAL
The first reviewer, Mr. Raker, is right about one thing: it ain't exactly like the book. Purists and high school English teachers can go on showing David Lean's classic B&W if fresh, creative vision offends them, but screenwriter Sarah Phelps has done something remarkable - she has given Dickens' impossibly precious title character a spine. This Oliver stands up to his tormentors, despite the cruel handicap of being young, and the result is that we no longer pity the lad, we actually care about him.It was unseemly to torpedo this excellent re-visioning of Oliver Twist, tautly directed by Coky Giedroyc, before it had been shown on PBS, for it clearly was made by intelligent artists who did not deviate from the original just to be different. They bring a creepy slumdog vitality to an old and well-loved story.
V**N
Wonderful film by a gifted English director
A marvelous tribute to one of Dickens' most celebrated young heroes. Superb acting, atmospheric photography, and an uexpected dollop of lively upbeat music that belies the often harrowing scenes of the young Oliver's existence. Fagin and Nancy are given lots of screen time, and enriched beyond their roles in the novel. Thomas Hardy is, as ever, a deliciously demonic presence in the role of Bill Sykes. Fine for older children.
E**N
No, it's not the book, but it's still really good
I am a big fan of classic literature, and I love well-done adaptations. I really enjoyed this version of Oliver Twist. The mannerisms of the characters and the music are all very modern, and though I enjoy the more closely representational adaptations, I enjoy the ones that take more liberties as well.I personally thought the acting was well-done. I enjoyed the different takes on Dickens' characters. The camera work added another modern and fun note. It's a very up-beat, fast-paced, and exciting adaptation.In short, there are an abundance of bad reviews for this movie, so I thought I'd try and give it a lift. Check it out. If you like classic literature adaptations, and you're not of the overly-purist sect, I think you'll enjoy it.
R**E
Great Interpretation
Tom Hardy Fan! This was a fantastic adaptation of the classic Oliver Twist! Great cast chosen for this video! Bravo!
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
2 weeks ago